Thank you, Dina! I'm Russian and I never heard of “Forbidden” Paintings By Aivazovsky. Very interesting piece of information ( but not a bit surprising considering our history!) Good summary on pandemic censorship
Vote for awake candidates who share your visions. And meanwhile, if you don’t know what else to do, do local, local, local. Oppose the transgender curriculum at the local school board meeting. Support local freedom candidates, or support an influencer who is moving the needle. Go get on the library board. Volunteer at the local offices of an organization that shares your goals and start earning a voice with your sweat equity.
Article states Quote, PROPHYLAXIS: everyone who is "high risk" -- including policemen, firemen, healthcare workers, and nursing home patients -- take HCQ to keep from getting sick.
Getting sick is not the same as being infected, Prophylaxis with HCQ does not protect you from getting infected, in fact it increases the chance of infection as HCQ reduces the action of the innate immune response to infection. What you do gain from taking HCQ prior to infection is to have already started EARLY treatment for when you become infected, this will then stop any progression to a more critical stage. Don`t fall into the trap being laid by Pharma, see the Gov funded Lancet Paton prophylactic study. HCQ cannot stop viral infection but with early treatment it certainly will stop the progression of the illness., Pharma want this drug gone as they have nothing that can compete.
HCQ is a highly effective therapeutic drug that will treat ALL influenza airborne type viral infections. There has never been a CQ/HCQ study with the title THERAPEUTIC in the gold standard Ferret, the reason is, it would show high effect whic is NOT what Pharma want to see.
My wife 78, had flue like symptoms on day 1 Jan 2021, on day 2 she stayed in bed with temp of 102f feeling really ill, we started treatment early on day 2, 48 hours later and all symtoms were gone.
If you read studies pre 2020 its all about prophylaxis, the Vigerust & McCullers study expected the reader to believe ONE low 10mg/kg dose 24 hours prior to infection turned a 5 dose therapeutic study into a Prophylactic study, total rubbish. That study is the only study in the world to test CQ in the Gold standard Ferret, it has never been replicated, no questions have ever been asked as to why McCullers stopped providing nasal wash titer data after day 4 or why the dose was so low or the reason for the pre viral challenge dose, or why the mouse leg of the study was longer than the Ferret leg, not even the UK (NHS) asked those questions. Fraud, the whole virology scene around Influenza type infection in controlled by Pharma.
France started the process of changing the status of HCQ from over the counter to a poison requiring a prescription on 16th Dec 2019, the WHO china office informed the WHO of an unrecognised viral infection in Wuhan on Jan 8th 2020. France banned HCQ from in the community treatment for Covi Flu later in Jan 2020, the UK stopped doctors using HCQ off label for covd Flu around the same time. Was the timing just a coincidence.??? This study below is the only Chloroquine study in the gold standard Ferret model EVER to be accepted by any medical journal, there are NO others. The study was referenced by the UK NHS in a 2017- 2022 Mers treatment guide, 48 other studies have referred to this study, 24 post 2020, all were attempting to discredit the antiviral effect of CQ. I believe the study was designed to fail and is in my opinion outright fraud. The UK document has now been removed, see Wayback, http://web.archive.org/web/20220127021837/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/638628/mers_cov_guidance_for_clinicians.pdf.
Within this advice a study showing 98.6% survival against Human OC43 Corona virus was buried in ref 5, page 16, all other studies had direct references. The NHS made NO distinction between Highly effective Therapeutic treatment studies and totally ineffective prophylactic studies. This fraudulent study was the only study the NHS had to verify their statement, (Quote No consistent activity in animal models of influenza), this guide was for Corona NOT influenza??. see vid of Nasal wash viral titer graph and link to study. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-NCV9cqN-g Vid clears half way,
then enlarge, dont know how to post picture in Twitter
Thank you for this information. I can do a story (or multiple ones) about HCQ, as documented on my FB feed, all kinds of interesting things happened with it, in a very bad sense of the word... You say "totally ineffective prophylactic studies", but it's not true. If you dig deeper, those were effective too. But with HCQ, prophylactic effectiveness takes longer to build up than with IVM, and they cut off the study just as it got effective.
I am commenting mainly on animal studies, there is only ONE CQ study listed in Pubmed that uses the gold standard Ferret, that is the Vigerust and McCullers (fraudulent or designed to fail) CQ mouse and ferret study. This study clearly shows in the nasal wash titer data graph on day 1 that when CQ is given prior to infection it reduces the innate immune response to any following infection, the viral load was far higher in the CQ treated group than in the control on day one when viral challenge occurred. As you say these are short duration studies but the point is, CQ reduces the response of the innate immune system and CQ/HCQ`s antiviral mode of action is cellular not viral, that is why CQ was effective for both Delta and Omicron when Iver was not. Its weak based action increases the Ph within the cellular acidic vesicals especially endosomes, this antiviral action can only occur when the virus is trapped inside a now fully formed endosome within the cell. CQ/HCQ do not stop viral infection as has been shown in the Lancet Paton influenza trial. Even though the population of Haiti suffer from endemic Malaria they don`t die from Covid, they take HCQ weekly as prevention from Malaria, the drug has a long half life and builds up within the system, even with many weeks of taking the drug it still does not stop infection but does with the accumulating doses and CQ`s long half life stop any further viral replication within the infected animal or human. CQ/HCQ is a highly effective Therapeutic antiviral and personally tested by my wife and I, 48 hours and all symptoms cleared. Zev Zelenko hit the bulls eye.
Prophylaxis treatment is designed to stop infection, CQ/HCQ cannot do that., the antiviral action of CQ/HCQ occurs after infection not before. Even if CQ/HCQ is given before and continued after infection, it still cannot stop infection, if it cannot stop infection but can reduce infection it is a therapeutic treatment
. See study, . doi:10.1111/j.1750-2659.2007.00027.x Look at day 1 in the Ferrets nasal wash Titer data graph. 1 dose of CQ was given 24 hours pre viral challenge, look at the Log number of the CQ treated group compared to the control on day 1 , CQ group is log 10 7.6 control is Log 10 5.4.
As I said CQ reduces the innate immune response to the later infection if given as a prophylactic. That 1 CQ dose 24 hrs earlier caused that high viral level in the treated group on day 1. No data after the day 3 and 4 event.
Actually, both HCQ and IVM have prophylactic properties, but the HCQ needs to be taken longer before it builds up enough to have that effect. In India, the "frontline" people (which to them means the healthcare workers who traveled to sick people's houses) were prophylaxed, and at first it was with HCQ.
Propyhlactic treatment will not stop infection, it cannot as CQ/HCQ reduces the innate immune response to a later viral attack, it will though reduce the severity of that viral attack. Prophylactic treatment with CQ/HCQ is not viable in the general population, Therapeutic treatment with CQ/HCQ is. It is taken shortly after symptoms occur, the difference is when CQ/HCQ are taken therapeutically the innate immune response is still effected but at the same time CQ/HCQ`s antiviral action is in play, this cannot occur if the drug is given prior to infection. The end result will be less viral load and a shorter illness, in my 78 year old wifes case, Covid gone in 48 hours. doi:10.1038/cr.2012.165 2012, No other CQ influenza Therapeutic studies since that Yan study ???.
I heard Dr Malone in that 3hr conversation with Steve Kirsch, and Bret Weinstein.
He was it seemed to be basically refusing to go against the vaxx/ mRNA and it seems that he sued many who are heroes in this freedom/ health movement. So I do wonder what is his true agenda. Big money. Deep connections to Darpa. Just saying… I have no inner knowledge or anything really against the man.
How long ago was that conversation? I know that Malone was pro-vaxx at first, but now he definitely knows better. Would you like me to do a story on him, based on what I've posted on FB about him over the past 4 years?
There are people who believe he ALWAYS knew mRNA was dangerous.
I don’t fully understand to be honest. But I think people should know. He could be protecting Darpa.
US President needs to tell all countries that depend on their protection to either come clean on Covid, remove mandates, back pay for lost wages, or lose all protection and free trade with US.
Thank you, Dina! I'm Russian and I never heard of “Forbidden” Paintings By Aivazovsky. Very interesting piece of information ( but not a bit surprising considering our history!) Good summary on pandemic censorship
Thank you Dina for all of those posts that you shared in the substack. They document the censorship of information that happened.
This is just 2020... It kept getting worse and worse in 2021 and 2022!
Now that this is known what is the appropriate citizen response to a military dictatorship?
Vote for awake candidates who share your visions. And meanwhile, if you don’t know what else to do, do local, local, local. Oppose the transgender curriculum at the local school board meeting. Support local freedom candidates, or support an influencer who is moving the needle. Go get on the library board. Volunteer at the local offices of an organization that shares your goals and start earning a voice with your sweat equity.
Article states Quote, PROPHYLAXIS: everyone who is "high risk" -- including policemen, firemen, healthcare workers, and nursing home patients -- take HCQ to keep from getting sick.
Getting sick is not the same as being infected, Prophylaxis with HCQ does not protect you from getting infected, in fact it increases the chance of infection as HCQ reduces the action of the innate immune response to infection. What you do gain from taking HCQ prior to infection is to have already started EARLY treatment for when you become infected, this will then stop any progression to a more critical stage. Don`t fall into the trap being laid by Pharma, see the Gov funded Lancet Paton prophylactic study. HCQ cannot stop viral infection but with early treatment it certainly will stop the progression of the illness., Pharma want this drug gone as they have nothing that can compete.
HCQ is a highly effective therapeutic drug that will treat ALL influenza airborne type viral infections. There has never been a CQ/HCQ study with the title THERAPEUTIC in the gold standard Ferret, the reason is, it would show high effect whic is NOT what Pharma want to see.
My wife 78, had flue like symptoms on day 1 Jan 2021, on day 2 she stayed in bed with temp of 102f feeling really ill, we started treatment early on day 2, 48 hours later and all symtoms were gone.
If you read studies pre 2020 its all about prophylaxis, the Vigerust & McCullers study expected the reader to believe ONE low 10mg/kg dose 24 hours prior to infection turned a 5 dose therapeutic study into a Prophylactic study, total rubbish. That study is the only study in the world to test CQ in the Gold standard Ferret, it has never been replicated, no questions have ever been asked as to why McCullers stopped providing nasal wash titer data after day 4 or why the dose was so low or the reason for the pre viral challenge dose, or why the mouse leg of the study was longer than the Ferret leg, not even the UK (NHS) asked those questions. Fraud, the whole virology scene around Influenza type infection in controlled by Pharma.
France started the process of changing the status of HCQ from over the counter to a poison requiring a prescription on 16th Dec 2019, the WHO china office informed the WHO of an unrecognised viral infection in Wuhan on Jan 8th 2020. France banned HCQ from in the community treatment for Covi Flu later in Jan 2020, the UK stopped doctors using HCQ off label for covd Flu around the same time. Was the timing just a coincidence.??? This study below is the only Chloroquine study in the gold standard Ferret model EVER to be accepted by any medical journal, there are NO others. The study was referenced by the UK NHS in a 2017- 2022 Mers treatment guide, 48 other studies have referred to this study, 24 post 2020, all were attempting to discredit the antiviral effect of CQ. I believe the study was designed to fail and is in my opinion outright fraud. The UK document has now been removed, see Wayback, http://web.archive.org/web/20220127021837/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/638628/mers_cov_guidance_for_clinicians.pdf.
Within this advice a study showing 98.6% survival against Human OC43 Corona virus was buried in ref 5, page 16, all other studies had direct references. The NHS made NO distinction between Highly effective Therapeutic treatment studies and totally ineffective prophylactic studies. This fraudulent study was the only study the NHS had to verify their statement, (Quote No consistent activity in animal models of influenza), this guide was for Corona NOT influenza??. see vid of Nasal wash viral titer graph and link to study. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-NCV9cqN-g Vid clears half way,
then enlarge, dont know how to post picture in Twitter
Thank you for this information. I can do a story (or multiple ones) about HCQ, as documented on my FB feed, all kinds of interesting things happened with it, in a very bad sense of the word... You say "totally ineffective prophylactic studies", but it's not true. If you dig deeper, those were effective too. But with HCQ, prophylactic effectiveness takes longer to build up than with IVM, and they cut off the study just as it got effective.
I am commenting mainly on animal studies, there is only ONE CQ study listed in Pubmed that uses the gold standard Ferret, that is the Vigerust and McCullers (fraudulent or designed to fail) CQ mouse and ferret study. This study clearly shows in the nasal wash titer data graph on day 1 that when CQ is given prior to infection it reduces the innate immune response to any following infection, the viral load was far higher in the CQ treated group than in the control on day one when viral challenge occurred. As you say these are short duration studies but the point is, CQ reduces the response of the innate immune system and CQ/HCQ`s antiviral mode of action is cellular not viral, that is why CQ was effective for both Delta and Omicron when Iver was not. Its weak based action increases the Ph within the cellular acidic vesicals especially endosomes, this antiviral action can only occur when the virus is trapped inside a now fully formed endosome within the cell. CQ/HCQ do not stop viral infection as has been shown in the Lancet Paton influenza trial. Even though the population of Haiti suffer from endemic Malaria they don`t die from Covid, they take HCQ weekly as prevention from Malaria, the drug has a long half life and builds up within the system, even with many weeks of taking the drug it still does not stop infection but does with the accumulating doses and CQ`s long half life stop any further viral replication within the infected animal or human. CQ/HCQ is a highly effective Therapeutic antiviral and personally tested by my wife and I, 48 hours and all symptoms cleared. Zev Zelenko hit the bulls eye.
Yes, HCQ works for prophylaxis. Here is a post of mine from August 2020 about how it was being used in India
https://www.facebook.com/dqgoldin/posts/10223729452245605
Prophylaxis treatment is designed to stop infection, CQ/HCQ cannot do that., the antiviral action of CQ/HCQ occurs after infection not before. Even if CQ/HCQ is given before and continued after infection, it still cannot stop infection, if it cannot stop infection but can reduce infection it is a therapeutic treatment
. See study, . doi:10.1111/j.1750-2659.2007.00027.x Look at day 1 in the Ferrets nasal wash Titer data graph. 1 dose of CQ was given 24 hours pre viral challenge, look at the Log number of the CQ treated group compared to the control on day 1 , CQ group is log 10 7.6 control is Log 10 5.4.
As I said CQ reduces the innate immune response to the later infection if given as a prophylactic. That 1 CQ dose 24 hrs earlier caused that high viral level in the treated group on day 1. No data after the day 3 and 4 event.
Actually, both HCQ and IVM have prophylactic properties, but the HCQ needs to be taken longer before it builds up enough to have that effect. In India, the "frontline" people (which to them means the healthcare workers who traveled to sick people's houses) were prophylaxed, and at first it was with HCQ.
Propyhlactic treatment will not stop infection, it cannot as CQ/HCQ reduces the innate immune response to a later viral attack, it will though reduce the severity of that viral attack. Prophylactic treatment with CQ/HCQ is not viable in the general population, Therapeutic treatment with CQ/HCQ is. It is taken shortly after symptoms occur, the difference is when CQ/HCQ are taken therapeutically the innate immune response is still effected but at the same time CQ/HCQ`s antiviral action is in play, this cannot occur if the drug is given prior to infection. The end result will be less viral load and a shorter illness, in my 78 year old wifes case, Covid gone in 48 hours. doi:10.1038/cr.2012.165 2012, No other CQ influenza Therapeutic studies since that Yan study ???.
n.y
I heard Dr Malone in that 3hr conversation with Steve Kirsch, and Bret Weinstein.
He was it seemed to be basically refusing to go against the vaxx/ mRNA and it seems that he sued many who are heroes in this freedom/ health movement. So I do wonder what is his true agenda. Big money. Deep connections to Darpa. Just saying… I have no inner knowledge or anything really against the man.
How long ago was that conversation? I know that Malone was pro-vaxx at first, but now he definitely knows better. Would you like me to do a story on him, based on what I've posted on FB about him over the past 4 years?
It was early on like 3 years ago. You should listen.
https://rumble.com/v20gj44-bret-weinstein-robert-malone-md-and-steve-kirsch-save-the-world-in-3-steps-.html
There are people who believe he ALWAYS knew mRNA was dangerous.
I don’t fully understand to be honest. But I think people should know. He could be protecting Darpa.
US President needs to tell all countries that depend on their protection to either come clean on Covid, remove mandates, back pay for lost wages, or lose all protection and free trade with US.